The End of Picasa

A couple of days ago Google announced that they were discontinuing Picasa. Not really a surprise to those of us that understand that any and all Google services may disappear at any time with little notice. Certainly not a surprise to everyone that always wondered how Google would make money off offering the best photo management tool for free. But a stunning surprise for those of us who depend on the not too much non-sense get right down to work features of Picasa. So what is a user to do?

Google Photos

Google would like you to move to their online service Google Photos. Simply upload all your photos to Google and they will be available via the Google Photos website or in the apps available for iOS or Android. Okay if you were suspicious about how Google made money from Picasa, how are they going to make money from the online service? Their overhead just skyrocketed. I may have a paltry 14GB of images but my wife is closing on 250GB. Back of the envelope calculation suggests this would cost Google about $4-5/year to store.  I figure that in essence our cameras have become Google’s eyes in the real world. Google hopes to analyze our photos and derive some economically useful data from the photos. More disturbing is that I now have to trust that Google will not pull the rug out from me. If Google Photos is the only place all my photos exist, do they really exist? I have no control over Google so what is to keep them from cutting off my access to my photos some day because they decide they can’t make money off my photos? So for all the polish and ease of sharing photos, I can not recommend this service to anyone.

Photo Library Software Requirements

So how can I select and choose a software package to recommend? I need some criteria against which to evaluate a product. I think the first criteria is that a photo manager must leave me in control. My photos have to remain in my possession and accessible to me. I think the second criteria is it must organize, I need to be able to import photos form camera cards and mobile devices. The software should let me group, tag and search for photos.  Third, any software I recommend must be reliable and work on the devices my clients use. As we will see this puts me in a difficult position because thus far I have found nothing that meets all of these needs. Let’s look at some candidates though:

Adobe Lightroom

Adobe’s Lightroom product is first and foremost designed for professional photographers It supports multiple Libraries which is a nice feature though not one of my criteria. Lightroom imports photos from camera cards supports RAW adjustments, tags images and allows me to group photos in folders on my computer. It is only available for Windows and Mac. It is not the most reliable software… move photos around outside its interface and it does not follow the moves. The catalog files are too easy to corrupt and it is expensive. But the biggest negative is there is a steep learning curve to get started using this software.

Pros: Multiple Libraries, RAW Support, Organizes Photos

Cons: Price, limited Platforms, Unreliable, Difficult to use

Apple PhotosApplePhotos

Apple at one point dominated the photo organizer market with their iPhoto product. That was a decade ago and trying to reclaim that mojo while adapting to the mobile world they have released Photos… which I will be calling Apple Photos to try to reduce confusion. Apple Photos is designed to work the same on iOS and Mac OS. There is no Windows, Linux or Android version however. Photos can import images from Camera cards and building upon the iCloud service sync photos across your Apple devices over the network, no plugging cords in. I’ve been surprised at the simple learning curve getting used to Photos though clients coming from iPhoto do feel like the rug was pulled out from under them as Photos lacks many features (like albums) my clients used in iPhoto. Photos like iPhoto stores your images in a document bundle that you can not interact with directly thus trapping your images in the software sans intervention from a command line ninja.

Pros: Ease of Use, cordless syncing from Apple’s Mobile devices, RAW Support, Organizes Photos

Cons: limited Platforms, takes exclusive control of photos

Windows Photo GalleryWindowsPhotoGallery2012

Windows Photo Gallery is part of the Windows Live Essentials package and can installed for free from the Microsoft website. It is Windows only and was last updated in 2012. Windows 8 and newer have a simplistic photo viewer built in that Microsoft recommends as a replacement for the Windows Photo Gallery however the Windows Live Essentials 2012 version will seem familiar to power users of Microsoft software Circa 2009 such as Windows 7 and Office 2010 though it is a difficult interface for people to learn. Windows Photo Gallery imposes no restriction on how you organize your photos, can tag and search for photos.

Pros: All in all a good product

Cons: Windows only, abandoned by Microsoft, importing from mobile devices is difficult, the tabbed interface is less useful than menus and a simple, customizable tool bar would have been.

ShotwellShotwell

Shotwell is a photo manager for Linux. And most geeks don’t associate well designed Graphical User Interface software with Linux but Shotwell shines as an example of what can be done by passionate developers. Shotwell like Picasa and Lightroom uses a database for tracking images however one can easily delete this database and Shotwell will rebuild it on the next launch. The database is also a standard sqlite3 database meaning that command line gurus can manipulate it with out breaking Shotwell. Shotwell leaves the user in control, they can for example manipulate photos outside the program.

Pros: Imports from camera cards, organizes, searches, tags, leaves the user in control

Cons: importing from mobile devices requires using the cord and is not the best, Linux only

Conclussion

I’ve been facing a hard decision over the past few years as Apple, Google and Microsoft try to adapt to the mobile focused world. The tech giants have not done a good job as Google insists that everything must be a web page (their strength), Microsoft insists everything must run on the latest version of Windows and Apple insists everything must run on Apple hardware.